Current time: 14/05/2024, 01:37 Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Mikro, Crewe
RE: Mikro, Crewe
(05/06/2021 10:20)mikestone Wrote:  I wonder if the change to the 39 is a clerical error while transposing the registration to the limited company - going to Hough, but not Wybunbury with nearly twice the population seems a little odd.

Traveline still shows journeys to Nantwich was a footnote that they are provided on behalf of Cheshire East council, so unless the council contract has been terminated they can't exactly change the route so it directly competes with another operator's route.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Mikro, Crewe - mikestone - 24/10/2016, 16:46
RE: Mikro, Crewe - mikestone - 05/01/2017, 14:02
RE: Mikro, Crewe - knutstransport - 19/12/2017, 16:05
RE: Mikro, Crewe - mikestone - 19/12/2017, 19:36
RE: Mikro, Crewe - YN05 WKE - 20/12/2017, 01:24
RE: Mikro, Crewe - mikestone - 20/12/2017, 11:42
RE: Mikro, Crewe - iMarkeh - 27/12/2017, 20:06
RE: Mikro, Crewe - mikestone - 27/12/2017, 20:36
RE: Mikro, Crewe - knutstransport - 28/12/2017, 10:27
RE: Mikro, Crewe - mikestone - 19/02/2018, 18:36
RE: Mikro, Crewe - mikestone - 02/03/2018, 15:39
RE: Mikro, Crewe - knutstransport - 26/06/2018, 16:45
RE: Mikro, Crewe - knutstransport - 08/09/2020, 13:23
RE: Mikro, Crewe - mikestone - 08/09/2020, 20:36
RE: Mikro, Crewe - mikestone - 10/01/2021, 17:59
RE: Mikro, Crewe - knutstransport - 30/03/2021, 11:40
RE: Mikro, Crewe - knutstransport - 02/06/2021, 18:15
RE: Mikro, Crewe - mikestone - 04/06/2021, 20:45
RE: Mikro, Crewe - mikestone - 05/06/2021, 10:20
RE: Mikro, Crewe - knutstransport - 05/06/2021 10:46
RE: Mikro, Crewe - mikestone - 22/02/2024, 21:47



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)