Forum | Merseyside Dennis Dart Website
Merseyrail - Printable Version

+- Forum | Merseyside Dennis Dart Website (http://dartslf.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Other Transport (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Forum: Railways (/forumdisplay.php?fid=10)
+--- Thread: Merseyrail (/showthread.php?tid=36)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417


RE: Merseyrail - Sprinterdriver - 05/09/2017 12:22

(03/09/2017 09:34)knutstransport Wrote:  Merseytravel Chief Executive, Frank Rogers:
“Keeping a second member of staff on the train, unnecessarily, will cost over £5m a year or £200m over the life of the new trains - money that could be much better spent on other key priorities across the city region. Interestingly suggestions from the RMT to fund the guards included putting up fares for passengers significantly over and above RPI incremental rises, extending the length of the existing Merseyrail Concession, or asking the Combined Authority to borrow an additional £200m, almost half the total cost of the new trains project - all options that are unpalatable, unworkable and unnecessary."
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/you-need-know-merseyrail-strikes-13563838

A bit hypocritical from the RMT - we protest against fare rises but if jobs are at risk the passengers should be made to be pay more.

I don't remember seeing the RMT saying that. They did say that a small amount of Merseyrail's profits each year would pay to keep Guards. That isn't money that would necessarily be spent in the Liverpool city region.

SD.


RE: Merseyrail - Sprinterdriver - 05/09/2017 12:23

(04/09/2017 21:49)WAITING FOR THE 437 Wrote:  The jobs aren't at risk! They will be re-deployed on the same rate if pay!

That's a secondary point though. The main point is keeping Guards on trains.

SD.


RE: Merseyrail - knutstransport - 05/09/2017 15:27

(05/09/2017 12:22)Sprinterdriver Wrote:  I don't remember seeing the RMT saying that. They did say that a small amount of Merseyrail's profits each year would pay to keep Guards. That isn't money that would necessarily be spent in the Liverpool city region.

Probably something they would only say in private, just like Northern have avoided saying anything about a guarantee about a second member of staff on board in public. Remember the RMT want their public image to be that are in favour in lower fares but at the same time want to increase staffing costs (they'll want the guards to get a good pay rise every year which will increase the total bill.)


RE: Merseyrail - SK15 GZG - 05/09/2017 19:55

According to another forum the new Stadler units have been allocated the Class 777 designation


RE: Merseyrail - WAITING FOR THE 437 - 05/09/2017 21:50

Do we know if the new class 777 have started being built yet?


RE: Merseyrail - H101GEV - 06/09/2017 19:18

The Class 777s aren't in build yet and I imagine it will still be a good few months away.

A bit late now, but 507001-507008 have now all been fitted with passenger counting equipment above the passenger doors. 507004 had received this modification first some 18 months or so back, with the remainder being fitted two or three months ago.


RE: Merseyrail - Gordon V - 19/09/2017 11:41

https://www.rmt.org.uk/news/rmt-confirms-new-phase-of-strike-action-on-merseyrail1909/


RE: Merseyrail - N271CKB - 19/09/2017 12:03

Timed to hit the hardest with Lime Street being closed


RE: Merseyrail - Gordon V - 19/09/2017 12:05

(19/09/2017 12:03)N271CKB Wrote:  Timed to hit the hardest with Lime Street being closed

Yes,they'll probably throw most of the resources onto the Southport to Liverpool South Parkway line to keep that running at the expense of other lines that normally have a limited service during the previous strikes


RE: Merseyrail - wirralbus - 19/09/2017 13:33

(19/09/2017 12:05)Gordon V Wrote:  Yes,they'll probably throw most of the resources onto the Southport to Liverpool South Parkway line to keep that running at the expense of other lines that normally have a limited service during the previous strikes

Especially considering Merseyrail have yet to run out beyond Hooton on any strike days to date.

Dont forget No service has operated on the South Liverpool line either , so maybe the guards that they are using will need some rudimentary route learning.