Forum | Merseyside Dennis Dart Website
Stagecoach MCSL - Gillmoss Depot - Printable Version

+- Forum | Merseyside Dennis Dart Website (http://dartslf.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Buses (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Local Bus Scene: North West and Wales (/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Stagecoach MCSL - Gillmoss Depot (/showthread.php?tid=1522)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538


RE: Stagecoach Merseyside - Gillmoss Depot - mbonwick - 23/10/2012 00:07

You know what? Seeing as cumbria09 and myself keep getting told we're wrong, and because you lot all seem to think you can run a company more effectively than trained, full time people, why don't you apply for Operations Manager/Director/Advisor at Gillmoss?!

Either that or start writing into Stagecoach with all your brilliant ideas.

We've explained enough the logic behind these things, and tbh I think its quite pathetic that - as a community - you can't grasp that.

London Tridents aren't worth converting - the amount needed to convert them to S/D is more than they're worth on paper. Plus the fact that most of the examples currently available are either knackered or the short 9.9m wheelbase, which you'd hate for capacity reasons!

I won't say anything about the ticketing, as I have no real knowledge, but if I can understand what's valid and what's not, then it can't be too difficult!


RE: Stagecoach Merseyside - Gillmoss Depot - Neoplan N4009 - 23/10/2012 00:16

I think it's quite pathetic that people like yourself mbonwick can't accept someone's opinion. Lets just look at it this way, do you even get the buses? No. So I suggest you keep you're little thoughts to yourself. Who even said about ideas? It's simple common knowledge that most if not all routes inherited from GTL were infact "double deck", ah anyway what's the point as I can see in your world passengers should cope with standing loads so yep I'll leave it at that who said you were wrong? nobody. Yeah exactly


RE: Stagecoach Merseyside - Gillmoss Depot - CX06 EBK - 23/10/2012 00:20

There is a simple reply to that, Stagecoach do not give a damn about capacity in this city nor do they give a damn about QBPs. SPDs are now a seemingly daily allocation to the route along with awful PX55 Darts. These are woefully inadequate as are the 9 Tridents which are still breaching the QBP anyway and as a result Stagecoach look really poor alongside Arriva. You can't seem to grasp that capacity is an issue within this city especially on Stagecoach routes due to poor buses used on services. Without travelling on them regularly, like many of us do, it's hard to even justify Stagecoaches half hearted attempt at a token 9 deckers.


RE: Stagecoach Merseyside - Gillmoss Depot - mbonwick - 23/10/2012 00:25

I don't need to travel on any service to know why a certain sort of vehicle is allocated.

As we've said many times before, if the services were making enough money they'd have bigger vehicles. The fact that they don't means they aren't making enough money.

Full buses does not mean profit, especially with BSOG cuts. Therefore companies cannot justify the expenditure.

I think you lot down in Liverpool forget how nice you have it - try coming to Cumbria where there are occasional capacity problems, but we still have Olympians and B10Ms in frontline service! Enthusiasts aside, you have to admit that darts/Enviro300s give a better impression than B10Ms or B10BLEs.


RE: Stagecoach Merseyside - Gillmoss Depot - H101GEV - 23/10/2012 00:26

I wouldn't "hate" a 9.9 m decker at all - it's a start. As outlined above, the lion's share of Stagecoach Merseyside's inherited fleet was deckers, every single one of which was replaced with a wholly inadequate and apparently cheap Dart. Now we're even losing our valuable older full-size single deckers in favour of virtually identical Darts with poor interiors and nowhere near enough capacity. Each and every one of Stagecoach's city centre serving routes need at least full-size single decks and for the 10A, 20, 21, 82 and 86, 9.9 m double deckers as a minimum requirement. As outlined above, Arriva trounce Stagecoach on both South Liverpool QBP routes and with consistent breaches, arguably the North Liverpool ones as well.


RE: Stagecoach Merseyside - Gillmoss Depot - mbonwick - 23/10/2012 00:28

Have fun explaining to the accountants then why you think they should spend more than the 9.9m Tridents are worth converting them!

How do you know the darts aren't just a stop gap measure? To me it screams of improving the business case for when new vehicles arrive.


RE: Stagecoach Merseyside - Gillmoss Depot - H101GEV - 23/10/2012 00:30

(23/10/2012 00:28)mbonwick Wrote:  Have fun explaining to the accountants then why you think they should spend more than the 9.9m Tridents are worth converting them!

That certainly isn't the point. You said we'd "hate" 9.9 m deckers for "capacity reasons" which is absolute nonsense. I don't think anyone on here would prefer the status quo with extremely overcrowded buses regularly failing to meet demand.


RE: Stagecoach Merseyside - Gillmoss Depot - CX06 EBK - 23/10/2012 00:31

The Darts don't give a better impression at all, if you think that then god knows what the Arriva fleet gives off, far superior buses in every aspect. You clearly have no idea about Liverpool or its routes at all, the Darts are tired and awfully presented in general and are regularly leaving Liverpool crammed full of passengers, this is no lie either. 42 seater buses are just unacceptable for the 20/1, 82/6 and other routes Stagecoach operate on. They really have no excuse on the first two as they have no competition on these services from Arriva anyway.

There are still people to this day who let Stagecoach go by to use a far superior bus operated by Arriva. At least their allocations on the 82 and 86 are usually always double deckers. Arriva can do it yet Stagecoach can't, Arriva can even do it on "lesser" routes too.

At the end of the day many on here are regular users of buses from an actual passengers point of view, not someone who thinks management are right in every decision by bringing in more crappy Dart SLFs to replace older buses. Wouldn't surprise me one bit if the Tridents are shipped out soon under some crappy excuse as that's all they can offer. Poor excuses for poor service.


RE: Stagecoach Merseyside - Gillmoss Depot - mbonwick - 23/10/2012 00:32

(23/10/2012 00:30)507009 Wrote:  
(23/10/2012 00:28)mbonwick Wrote:  Have fun explaining to the accountants then why you think they should spend more than the 9.9m Tridents are worth converting them!

That certainly isn't the point. You said we'd "hate" 9.9 m deckers for "capacity reasons" which is absolute nonsense. I don't think anyone on here would prefer the status quo with extremely overcrowded buses regularly failing to meet demand.

It IS the point. Bottom line is making the figures work. If you don't believe that, god help you trying to run a business!


RE: Stagecoach Merseyside - Gillmoss Depot - H101GEV - 23/10/2012 00:37

(23/10/2012 00:32)mbonwick Wrote:  It IS the point. Bottom line is making the figures work. If you don't believe that, god help you trying to run a business!

The point is your suggestion that we would hate any sort of capacity improvement is complete and utter bullsh*t, and an extremely poorly thought-out response.

At the end of the day, there ARE a lot of deckers available, with Stagecoach releasing various Tridents from London which have gone to independent operators (including PeoplesBus right here in Liverpool, whose Tridents incidentally look a lot better than Stagecoach's do), as well as still others for scrap. There is absolutely no excuse - how Merseyside apparently cannot "justify" new deckers while an operation with a much smaller potential for passengers, e.g. Preston, can, is anyone's guess.